Legislature(2003 - 2004)
03/01/2004 01:35 PM Senate HES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 301-PIONEERS' HOMES/VETERANS' HOMES The committee took up SB 301. CHAIR DYSON stated there is a proposed committee substitute (CS), version I. SENATOR LYDA GREEN moved to adopt version I, the proposed CS for SB 301, for discussion purposes. CHAIR DYSON asked if there was any objection. SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS objected and asked a procedural question. She noted that she has four objections on record to Amendments 1 through 4, and questioned whether this CS addressed those objections and whether she needed to remove her objection. CHAIR DYSON said if she concludes those are not addressed, the CS would be withdrawn to allow her the chance to address those amendments. SENATOR GUESS said Amendments 1 - 4 were Senator Green's amendments. She withdrew her objections to those four amendments so that the CS could be adopted. CHAIR DYSON announced version I [labeled 23-GS2085\I, Mischel, 3/1/04] was the working document before the committee. MR. DENNY DeWITT, Staff Assistant to Governor Murkowski explained the changes made to version I as follows: Page 6, line 29, "may" was changed to "shall." Page 7, lines 1 - 3, the additional language, "The only Pioneers' Home that may be maintained as a Veterans' Home is the Pioneers' Home located in Palmer, Alaska." Page 8, line 6, the word "sale" was removed. Page 9, after line 19, the section relative to veteran's benefits and 38 U.S.C. 1110 was removed, at the recommendation of veterans' organizations. Page 12, lines 20 - 23, in checking with the Veterans' Administration (VA), the new definition of veteran is a person who has been discharged from the armed forces of the U.S., including the Alaska National Guard or the Alaska Territorial Guard so "the discharge from the armed forces must be other than dishonorable" was added. Also, sections pertaining to AS 47.55.035 indicate a resident of 30 years could go outside and maintain his/her place on the waiting list. The administration recommends this remain in statute and that it be addressed in another venue. AS 44.29.400 was put together in 1992 to try and build a self-sustaining Veterans' Home in Alaska, and it didn't work. Therefore, this bill involves state participation in the cost of care to the Veterans' Home. Regarding Sec. 25 (b) and (c), in 2002, the Legislature passed legislation regarding a pilot project to use the Pioneers' Homes collectively as a Veterans' Home. This has not been - and it is unlikely that it will be - acceptable to the Veterans' Administration. SENATOR GUESS referred to Sec. 25 and asked, "Why not keep those on the record? Would repealing these mean that we couldn't, without coming back to this body, build a self-sustaining Veterans' Home and/or have a pilot?" MR. DeWITT responded he doubts that either of those would be the case. In the first instance, language on page 6, line 31, allows for the operation of one or more Veterans' Homes. Regarding the envisioned pilot program, it would take additional congressional action, but it could be taken advantage of because Sec. 15 is broad enough. He said they are cleaning the books of things that are extremely unlikely to ever be used. Regarding AS 44.29.400, there is a conflict between what SB 301 allows and what this section requires, so it's important to repeal that section. He explained that in 1992 when this was added, the directive to the department/administration was to develop a process where state funding would not be [indisc.] to the Veterans' Home. The operations would be fully carried by folks in the home. There are explanations as to why it fiscally won't work, he added. SENATOR GUESS confirmed that under the CS, nothing prohibits having a self-sustaining facility or a pilot program. SENATOR LYDA GREEN asked if "020" was the pilot project. MR. DeWITT replied it was in the original bill, and referenced the Department of Health and Social Service (DH&SS). CHAIR DYSON said the legal department advised that making this specific to the Palmer Pioneer Home might be challenged constitutionally because of being single purpose legislation; he asked if this issue has been analyzed. MR. DeWITT said the administration had a slightly different opinion and it's important to articulate the reasons for conversion of the Palmer Pioneer Home. He explained it would become a state Veterans' Home, working with the U.S. Department of Veterans' Affairs. There is a change in the operational nature of that home because they will support only a limited number of beds as a Veterans' Home; there is a limitation of 79 beds, and a waiver of 3 beds. Changing from a Pioneers' to a Veterans' Home - although it will be operated almost identically to a Pioneers' Home, and by the same division - creates a defensible difference. Palmer has been articulated in the bill because changing a physical home to another use is a public policy issue that needs to be debated by the Legislature. According to their attorney general, there is significant public policy that would be upheld by any court of law. SENATOR GREEN inquired about which department would operate the Home, and the significance of that. 1:52 p.m. MR. DeWITT said Marian Harmon's (ph) administering of the Palmer Pioneers' Home would continue for as long as she would like. The Pioneers' Homes are operated by the DHSS, and the Veterans' Home will also be operated through the same division. The intent is to operate the Palmer Pioneers' Home - soon to be the Palmer Veterans' Home - similarly to operating the other Pioneers' Homes. VA regulations require that 75 percent of the residents are veterans, while 25 percent need not be veterans. The existing Pioneer Home waiting list will be used to fill that other 25 percent. It will be difficult to detect differences in the operation of the Palmer Home from other homes in the system because those differences will be slight. The social model developed in the early '90s will be used, as it's been extremely successful. The VA observed our operations and returned to Washington D.C. interested in what we've demonstrated regarding appropriate care for the geriatric population. "We think they are more likely to move towards us than we'll have to move towards them," he said. CHAIR DYSON asked if the attorney general would offer counsel in writing on the single purpose challenge. MR. DeWITT said this could be received in writing by the time SB 301 was in Senate Finance. CHAIR DYSON said he would appreciate this, but wouldn't hold the bill up. He said he understood if "general purpose" law could do the job, there shouldn't be a special purpose law. MR. DeWITT noted that although the administration didn't bring that amendment, they could defend it. That's a choice for the committee and the Legislature to take. CHAIR DYSON said the amendment was to give comfort that this specific remedy wouldn't spread to other facilities without due consideration. MR. DeWITT said the assistant attorney general views this similarly to building another facility in a specified place in Alaska. For example, if the Legislature decided to construct a Veterans' Home it wouldn't be considered as special legislation any more than changing the function of a specific Pioneers' Home. CHAIR DYSON wondered if the attorney general considered it wise to amend and include severability language in the bill so that progress on the bill wouldn't be negated in case particular wording is challenged. SENATOR GREEN moved to adopt the SB 301 Letter of Intent, entitled "Health, Education, and Social Services Committee Alaska State Senate Letter of Intent." CHAIR DYSON asked if there was any objection. Seeing none, it was so ordered. MR. HARRY JENKINS testified via teleconference and asked about bringing the abandoned hospital in Wasilla up to code rather than putting money into the Palmer Pioneers' Home. CHAIR DYSON said various experts felt this option would not be suitable and it would be far more expensive to bring the building up to code. MS. PATTI SKONDOVITCH testified via teleconference, and asked why Alaska is the only state that doesn't have a Veterans' Home that is paid for by the U.S. Government. MS. PAT FLEMMING, Pioneers of Alaska, testified from Wasilla, expressing concern about letting Pioneers' Homes deteriorate. She suggested legislative oversight of leasing or renting that might take place within the Pioneers' Home System. She wondered if the federal VA system recognizes the Alaska Pioneers' System as being unique. 2:00 p.m. MR. DeWITT responded VA representatives were in Alaska last August and visited the Palmer Valley Hospital in Palmer, and concluded that the cost would be prohibitive; it would be more difficult and the likelihood of the hospital being successful was not as probable as the Palmer Home. It was partially economics and partially construction issues. He responded it isn't accurate that Alaska is the only state without a Veterans' Home paid for by the U.S. government. The federal government assists in the building of state Veterans' Homes, participating in 65 percent of the capital costs while the states provide the other 35 percent. Alaska will get that same cost sharing. Currently there are three states without Veterans' Homes - Delaware, Hawaii, and Alaska - Hawaii is a bit ahead of Alaska in constructing a Home. Delaware is also applying and is a bit behind Alaska. Mr. DeWitt said soon all 50 states would have homes. SENATOR GREEN moved to report version I, CSSB 301 (HES), out of committee with the accompanying fiscal notes and the Letter of Intent. CHAIR DYSON asked if there was any objection. Seeing and hearing none, it was so ordered.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|